How Is Green Fluorescent Protein Used In Genetic Research Papers

"EGFP" redirects here. For the airport with that ICAO airport code, see Pembrey Airport.

The green fluorescent protein (GFP) is a protein composed of 238 amino acid residues (26.9 kDa) that exhibits bright green fluorescence when exposed to light in the blue to ultraviolet range.[2][3] Although many other marine organisms have similar green fluorescent proteins, GFP traditionally refers to the protein first isolated from the jellyfishAequorea victoria. The GFP from A. victoria has a major excitation peak at a wavelength of 395 nm and a minor one at 475 nm. Its emission peak is at 509 nm, which is in the lower green portion of the visible spectrum. The fluorescence quantum yield (QY) of GFP is 0.79. The GFP from the sea pansy (Renilla reniformis) has a single major excitation peak at 498 nm. GFP makes for an excellent tool in many forms of biology due to its ability to form internal chromophore without requiring any accessory cofactors, gene products, or enzymes / substrates other than molecular oxygen.[4]

In cell and molecular biology, the GFP gene is frequently used as a reporter of expression.[5] It has been used in modified forms to make biosensors, and many animals have been created that express GFP, which demonstrates a proof of concept that a gene can be expressed throughout a given organism, in selected organs, or in cells of interest. GFP can be introduced into animals or other species through transgenic techniques, and maintained in their genome and that of their offspring. To date, GFP has been expressed in many species, including bacteria, yeasts, fungi, fish and mammals, including in human cells. Scientists Roger Y. Tsien, Osamu Shimomura, and Martin Chalfie were awarded the 2008 Nobel Prize in Chemistry on 10 October 2008 for their discovery and development of the green fluorescent protein.

History[edit]

Wild-type GFP (wtGFP)[edit]

In the 1960s and 1970s, GFP, along with the separate luminescent protein aequorin (an enzyme that catalyzes the breakdown of luciferin, releasing light), was first purified from Aequorea victoria and its properties studied by Osamu Shimomura.[6] In A. victoria, GFP fluorescence occurs when aequorin interacts with Ca2+ ions, inducing a blue glow. Some of this luminescent energy is transferred to the GFP, shifting the overall color towards green.[7] However, its utility as a tool for molecular biologists did not begin to be realized until 1992 when Douglas Prasher reported the cloning and nucleotide sequence of wtGFP in Gene.[8] The funding for this project had run out, so Prasher sent cDNA samples to several labs. The lab of Martin Chalfie expressed the coding sequence of wtGFP, with the first few amino acids deleted, in heterologous cells of E. coli and C. elegans, publishing the results in Science in 1994.[9] Frederick Tsuji's lab independently reported the expression of the recombinant protein one month later.[10] Remarkably, the GFP molecule folded and was fluorescent at room temperature, without the need for exogenous cofactors specific to the jellyfish. Although this near-wtGFP was fluorescent, it had several drawbacks, including dual peaked excitation spectra, pH sensitivity, chloride sensitivity, poor fluorescence quantum yield, poor photostability and poor folding at 37 °C.

The first reported crystal structure of a GFP was that of the S65T mutant by the Remington group in Science in 1996.[11] One month later, the Phillips group independently reported the wild-type GFP structure in Nature Biotechnology.[12] These crystal structures provided vital background on chromophore formation and neighboring residue interactions. Researchers have modified these residues by directed and random mutagenesis to produce the wide variety of GFP derivatives in use today.

GFP derivatives[edit]

Due to the potential for widespread usage and the evolving needs of researchers, many different mutants of GFP have been engineered.[13][14] The first major improvement was a single point mutation (S65T) reported in 1995 in Nature by Roger Tsien.[15] This mutation dramatically improved the spectral characteristics of GFP, resulting in increased fluorescence, photostability, and a shift of the major excitation peak to 488 nm, with the peak emission kept at 509 nm. This matched the spectral characteristics of commonly available FITC filter sets, increasing the practicality of use by the general researcher. A 37 °C folding efficiency (F64L) point mutant to this scaffold, yielding enhanced GFP (EGFP), was discovered in 1995 by the laboratories of Thastrup[16] and Falkow.[17] EGFP allowed the practical use of GFPs in mammalian cells. EGFP has an extinction coefficient (denoted ε) of 55,000 M−1cm−1.[18] The fluorescence quantum yield (QY) of EGFP is 0.60. The relative brightness, expressed as ε•QY, is 33,000 M−1cm−1. Superfolder GFP, a series of mutations that allow GFP to rapidly fold and mature even when fused to poorly folding peptides, was reported in 2006.[19]

Many other mutations have been made, including color mutants; in particular, blue fluorescent protein (EBFP, EBFP2, Azurite, mKalama1), cyan fluorescent protein (ECFP, Cerulean, CyPet, mTurquoise2), and yellow fluorescent protein derivatives (YFP, Citrine, Venus, YPet). BFP derivatives (except mKalama1) contain the Y66H substitution.They exhibit a broad absorption band in the ultraviolet centered close to 380 nanometers and an emission maximum at 448 nanometers. A green fluorescent protein mutant (BFPms1) that preferentially binds Zn(II) and Cu(II) has been developed. BFPms1 have several important mutations including and the BFP chromophore (Y66H),Y145F for higher quantum yield, H148G for creating a hole into the beta-barrel and several other mutations that increase solubility. Zn(II) binding increases fluorescence intensity, while Cu(II) binding quenches fluorescence and shifts the absorbance maximum from 379 to 444 nm. Therefore, they can be used as Zn biosensor.[20]

The critical mutation in cyan derivatives is the Y66W substitution, which causes the chromophore to form with an indole rather than phenol component. Several additional compensatory mutations in the surrounding barrel are required to restore brightness to this modified chromophore due to the increased bulk of the indole group. In ECFP and Cerulean, the N-terminal half of the seventh strand exhibits two conformations. These conformations both have a complex set of van der Waals interactions with the chromophore. The Y145A and H148D mutations in Cerulean stabilize these interactions and allow the chromophore to be more planar, better packed, and less prone to collisional quenching.[21] Additional site-directed random mutagenesis in combination with fluorescence lifetime based screening has further stabilized the seventh β-strand resulting in a bright variant, mTurquoise2, with a quantum yield (QY) of 0.93.[22] The red-shifted wavelength of the YFP derivatives is accomplished by the T203Y mutation and is due to π-electron stacking interactions between the substituted tyrosine residue and the chromophore.[3] These two classes of spectral variants are often employed for Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments. Genetically encoded FRET reporters sensitive to cell signaling molecules, such as calcium or glutamate, protein phosphorylation state, protein complementation, receptor dimerization, and other processes provide highly specific optical readouts of cell activity in real time.

Semirational mutagenesis of a number of residues led to pH-sensitive mutants known as pHluorins, and later super-ecliptic pHluorins. By exploiting the rapid change in pH upon synaptic vesicle fusion, pHluorins tagged to synaptobrevin have been used to visualize synaptic activity in neurons.[23]

Redox sensitive versions of GFP (roGFP) were engineered by introduction of cysteines into the beta barrel structure. The redox state of the cysteines determines the fluorescent properties of roGFP.[24]

The nomenclature of modified GFPs is often confusing due to overlapping mapping of several GFP versions onto a single name. For example, mGFP often refers to a GFP with an N-terminal palmitoylation that causes the GFP to bind to cell membranes. However, the same term is also used to refer to monomeric GFP, which is often achieved by the dimer interface breaking A206K mutation.[25] Wild-type GFP has a weak dimerization tendency at concentrations above 5 mg/mL. mGFP also stands for "modified GFP," which has been optimized through amino acid exchange for stable expression in plant cells.

GFP in nature[edit]

The purpose of both the (primary) bioluminescence (from aequorin's action on luciferin) and the (secondary) fluorescence of GFP in jellyfish is unknown. GFP is co-expressed with aequorin in small granules around the rim of the jellyfish bell. The secondary excitation peak (480 nm) of GFP does absorb some of the blue emission of aequorin, giving the bioluminescence a more green hue. The serine 65 residue of the GFP chromophore is responsible for the dual-peaked excitation spectra of wild-type GFP. It is conserved in all three GFP isoforms originally cloned by Prasher. Nearly all mutations of this residue consolidate the excitation spectra to a single peak at either 395 nm or 480 nm. The precise mechanism of this sensitivity is complex, but, it seems, involves donation of a hydrogen from serine 65 to glutamate 222, which influences chromophore ionization.[3] Since a single mutation can dramatically enhance the 480 nm excitation peak, making GFP a much more efficient partner of aequorin, A. victoria appears to evolutionarily prefer the less-efficient, dual-peaked excitation spectrum. Roger Tsien has speculated that varying hydrostatic pressure with depth may affect serine 65's ability to donate a hydrogen to the chromophore and shift the ratio of the two excitation peaks. Thus, the jellyfish may change the color of its bioluminescence with depth. However, a collapse in the population of jellyfish in Friday Harbor, where GFP was originally discovered, has hampered further study of the role of GFP in the jellyfish's natural environment.

Other fluorescent proteins[edit]

Because of the great variety of engineered GFP derivatives, fluorescent proteins that belong to a different family, such as the bilirubin-inducible fluorescent protein UnaG, dsRed, eqFP611, Dronpa, TagRFPs, KFP, EosFP, Dendra, IrisFP and many others, are erroneously referred to as GFP derivatives. Several of these proteins display unique properties like red-shifted emission above 600 nm or photoconversion from a green-emitting state to a red-emitting state. These properties are so far unique to fluorescent proteins other than GFP derivatives.

FMN-binding fluorescent proteins (FbFPs) were developed in 2007[26] and are a class of small (11-16 kDa), oxygen-independent fluorescent proteins that are derived from blue-light receptors. They are intended especially for the use under anaerobic or hypoxic conditions, since the formation and binding of the Flavin chromophore does not require molecular oxygen, as it is the case with the synthesis of the GFP chromophore.

A new class of fluorescent protein was evolved from a cyanobacterial (Trichodesmium erythraeum) phycobiliprotein, α-allophycocyanin, and named small ultra red fluorescent protein (smURFP) in 2016. smURFPautocatalytically self-incorporates the chromophorebiliverdin without the need of an external protein, known as a lyase.[27]Jellyfish- and coral-derived fluorescent proteins require oxygen and produce a stoichiometric amount of hydrogen peroxide upon chromophore formation.[28]smURFP does not require oxygen or produce hydrogen peroxide and uses the chromophore, bliverdin. smURFP has a large extinction coefficient (180,000 M−1 cm−1) and has a modest quantum yield (0.20), which makes it comparable biophysical brightness to eGFP and ~2-fold brighter than most red or far-red fluorescent proteins derived from coral. smURFP spectral properties are similar to the organic dye Cy5.[27]

A review of new classes of fluorescent proteins and applications can be found in Trends in Biochemical Sciences.[29]

Structure[edit]

GFP has a beta barrel structure consisting of eleven β-strands, with an alpha helix containing the covalently bonded chromophore 4-(p-hydroxybenzylidene)imidazolidin-5-one (HBI) running through the center.[3][11][12] Five shorter alpha helices form caps on the ends of the structure. The beta barrel structure is a nearly perfect cylinder, 42Å long and 24Å in diameter,[11] creating what is referred to as a "β-can" formation, which is unique to the GFP-like family.[12] HBI, the spontaneously modified form of the tripeptide Ser65–Tyr66–Gly67, is nonfluorescent in the absence of the properly folded GFP scaffold and exists mainly in the un-ionized phenol form in wtGFP.[30] Inward-facing sidechains of the barrel induce specific cyclization reactions in Ser65–Tyr66–Gly67 that induce ionization of HBI to the phenolate form and chromophore formation. This process of post-translational modification is referred to as maturation.[31] The hydrogen-bonding network and electron-stacking interactions with these sidechains influence the color, intensity and photostability of GFP and its numerous derivatives.[32] The tightly packed nature of the barrel excludes solvent molecules, protecting the chromophore fluorescence from quenching by water.

Applications[edit]

Reporter assays[edit]

Green fluorescent protein may be used as a reporter gene.[33][34]

Advantages[edit]

The biggest advantage of GFP is that it can be heritable, depending on how it was introduced, allowing for continued study of cells and tissues it is expressed in. Visualizing GFP is noninvasive, requiring only illumination with blue light. GFP alone does not interfere with biological processes, but when fused to proteins of interest, careful design of linkers is required to maintain the function of the protein of interest. Moreover, if used with a monomer it is able to diffuse readily throughout cells.[35]

Fluorescence microscopy[edit]

Main article: Fluorescence microscope

The availability of GFP and its derivatives has thoroughly redefined fluorescence microscopy and the way it is used in cell biology and other biological disciplines.[36] While most small fluorescent molecules such as FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) are strongly phototoxic when used in live cells, fluorescent proteins such as GFP are usually much less harmful when illuminated in living cells. This has triggered the development of highly automated live-cell fluorescence microscopy systems, which can be used to observe cells over time expressing one or more proteins tagged with fluorescent proteins. For example, GFP had been widely used in labelling the spermatozoa of various organisms for identification purposes as in Drosophila melanogaster, where expression of GFP can be used as a marker for a particular characteristic. GFP can also be expressed in different structures enabling morphological distinction. In such cases, the gene for the production of GFP is incorporated into the genome of the organism in the region of the DNA that codes for the target proteins and that is controlled by the same regulatory sequence; that is, the gene's regulatory sequence now controls the production of GFP, in addition to the tagged protein(s). In cells where the gene is expressed, and the tagged proteins are produced, GFP is produced at the same time. Thus, only those cells in which the tagged gene is expressed, or the target proteins are produced, will fluoresce when observed under fluorescence microscopy. Analysis of such time lapse movies has redefined the understanding of many biological processes including protein folding, protein transport, and RNA dynamics, which in the past had been studied using fixed (i.e., dead) material. Obtained data are also used to calibrate mathematical models of intracellular systems and to estimate rates of gene expression.[37]

The Vertico SMI microscope using the SPDM Phymod technology uses the so-called "reversible photobleaching" effect of fluorescent dyes like GFP and its derivatives to localize them as single molecules in an optical resolution of 10 nm. This can also be performed as a co-localization of two GFP derivatives (2CLM).[38]

Another powerful use of GFP is to express the protein in small sets of specific cells. This allows researchers to optically detect specific types of cells in vitro (in a dish), or even in vivo (in the living organism).[39] Genetically combining several spectral variants of GFP is a useful trick for the analysis of brain circuitry (Brainbow).[40] Other interesting uses of fluorescent proteins in the literature include using FPs as sensors of neuronmembrane potential,[41] tracking of AMPA receptors on cell membranes,[42]viral entry and the infection of individual influenza viruses and lentiviral viruses,[43][44] etc.

It has also been found that new lines of transgenic GFP rats can be relevant for gene therapy as well as regenerative medicine.[45] By using "high-expresser" GFP, transgenic rats display high expression in most tissues, and many cells that have not been characterized or have been only poorly characterized in previous GFP-transgenic rats.

GFP has been shown to be useful in cryobiology as a viability assay. Correlation of viability as measured by trypan blue assays were 0.97.[46] Another application is the use of GFP co-transfection as internal control for transfection efficiency in mammalian cells.[47]

A novel possible use of GFP includes using it as a sensitive monitor of intracellular processes via an eGFP laser system made out of a human embryonic kidney cell line. The first engineered living laser is made by an eGFP expressing cell inside a reflective optical cavity and hitting it with pulses of blue light. At a certain pulse threshold, the eGFP's optical output becomes brighter and completely uniform in color of pure green with a wavelength of 516 nm. Before being emitted as laser light, the light bounces back and forth within the resonator cavity and passes the cell numerous times. By studying the changes in optical activity, researchers may better understand cellular processes.[48][49]

GFP is used widely in cancer research to label and track cancer cells. GFP-labelled cancer cells have been used to model metastasis, the process by which cancer cells spread to distant organs.[50]

Macro-photography[edit]

Macro-scale biological processes, such as the spread of virus infections, can be followed using GFP labeling.[51] In the past, mutagenic ultra violet light (UV) has been used to illuminate living organisms (e.g., see[52]) to detect and photograph the GFP expression. Recently, a technique using non-mutagenic LED lights[53] have been developed for macro-photography.[54] The technique uses an epifluorescence camera attachment[55] based on the same principle used in the construction of epifluorescence microscopes.

Transgenic pets[edit]

Mice expressing GFP under UV light (left & right), compared to normal mouse (center)

Alba, a green-fluorescent rabbit, was created by a French laboratory commissioned by Eduardo Kac using GFP for purposes of art and social commentary.[56] The US company Yorktown Technologies markets to aquarium shops green fluorescent zebrafish (GloFish) that were initially developed to detect pollution in waterways. NeonPets, a US-based company has marketed green fluorescent mice to the pet industry as NeonMice.[57] Green fluorescent pigs, known as Noels, were bred by a group of researchers led by Wu Shinn-Chih at the Department of Animal Science and Technology at National Taiwan University.[58] A Japanese-American Team created green-fluorescent cats as proof of concept to use them potentially as model organisms for diseases, particularly HIV.[59] In 2009 a South Korean team from Seoul National University bred the first transgenic beagles with fibroblast cells from sea anemones. The dogs give off a red fluorescent light, and they are meant to allow scientists to study the genes that cause human diseases like narcolepsy and blindness.[60]

Art[edit]

Julian Voss-Andreae, a German-born artist specializing in "protein sculptures,"[61] created sculptures based on the structure of GFP, including the 1.70 m (5'6") tall "Green Fluorescent Protein" (2004)[62] and the 1.40 m (4'7") tall "Steel Jellyfish" (2006). The latter sculpture is located at the place of GFP's discovery by Shimomura in 1962, the University of Washington's Friday Harbor Laboratories.[63]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^Ormö M, Cubitt AB, Kallio K, Gross LA, Tsien RY, Remington SJ (September 1996). "Crystal structure of the Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein". Science. 273 (5280): 1392–5. Bibcode:1996Sci...273.1392O. doi:10.1126/science.273.5280.1392. PMID 8703075. 
  2. ^Prendergast FG, Mann KG (Aug 1978). "Chemical and physical properties of aequorin and the green fluorescent protein isolated from Aequorea forskålea". Biochemistry. 17 (17): 3448–53. doi:10.1021/bi00610a004. PMID 28749. 
  3. ^ abcdTsien RY (1998). "The green fluorescent protein"(PDF). Annual Review of Biochemistry. 67: 509–44. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.509. PMID 9759496. 
  4. ^Stepanenko OV, Verkhusha VV, Kuznetsova IM, Uversky VN, Turoverov KK (Aug 2008). "Fluorescent proteins as biomarkers and biosensors: throwing color lights on molecular and cellular processes". Current Protein & Peptide Science. 9 (4): 338–69. doi:10.2174/138920308785132668. PMC 2904242. PMID 18691124. 
  5. ^Phillips GJ (Oct 2001). "Green fluorescent protein--a bright idea for the study of bacterial protein localization". FEMS Microbiology Letters. 204 (1): 9–18. doi:10.1016/S0378-1097(01)00358-5. PMID 11682170. 
  6. ^Shimomura O, Johnson FH, Saiga Y (Jun 1962). "Extraction, purification and properties of aequorin, a bioluminescent protein from the luminous hydromedusan, Aequorea". Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology. 59 (3): 223–39. doi:10.1002/jcp.1030590302. PMID 13911999. 
  7. ^Morise H, Shimomura O, Johnson FH, Winant J (Jun 1974). "Intermolecular energy transfer in the bioluminescent system of Aequorea". Biochemistry. 13 (12): 2656–62. doi:10.1021/bi00709a028. PMID 4151620. 
  8. ^Prasher DC, Eckenrode VK, Ward WW, Prendergast FG, Cormier MJ (Feb 1992). "Primary structure of the Aequorea victoria green-fluorescent protein". Gene. 111 (2): 229–33. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(92)90691-H. PMID 1347277. 
  9. ^Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G, Ward WW, Prasher DC (Feb 1994). "Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression". Science. 263 (5148): 802–5. Bibcode:1994Sci...263..802C. doi:10.1126/science.8303295. PMID 8303295. 
  10. ^Inouye S, Tsuji FI (Mar 1994). "Aequorea green fluorescent protein. Expression of the gene and fluorescence characteristics of the recombinant protein". FEBS Letters. 341 (2–3): 277–80. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(94)80472-9. PMID 8137953. 
  11. ^ abcOrmö M, Cubitt AB, Kallio K, Gross LA, Tsien RY, Remington SJ (Sep 1996). "Crystal structure of the Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein". Science. 273 (5280): 1392–5. Bibcode:1996Sci...273.1392O. doi:10.1126/science.273.5280.1392. PMID 8703075. 
  12. ^ abcYang F, Moss LG, Phillips GN (Oct 1996). "The molecular structure of green fluorescent protein". Nature Biotechnology. 14 (10): 1246–51. doi:10.1038/nbt1096-1246. PMID 9631087. 
  13. ^Shaner NC, Steinbach PA, Tsien RY (Dec 2005). "A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins"(PDF). Nature Methods. 2 (12): 905–9. doi:10.1038/nmeth819. PMID 16299475. 
  14. ^Wilhelmsson and Tor (2016). Fluorescent Analogs of Biomolecular Building Blocks: Design and Applications. New Jersey: Wiley. ISBN 978-1-118-17586-6. 
  15. ^Heim R, Cubitt AB, Tsien RY (Feb 1995). "Improved green fluorescence"(PDF). Nature. 373 (6516): 663–4. Bibcode:1995Natur.373..663H. doi:10.1038/373663b0. PMID 7854443. 
  16. ^US patent 6172188, Thastrup O, Tullin S, Kongsbak Poulsen L, Bjørn S, "Fluorescent Proteins", published 2001-01-09 
  17. ^Cormack BP, Valdivia RH, Falkow S (1996). "FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP)". Gene. 173 (1 Spec No): 33–38. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(95)00685-0. PMID 8707053. 
  18. ^McRae SR, Brown CL, Bushell GR (May 2005). "Rapid purification of EGFP, EYFP, and ECFP with high yield and purity". Protein Expression and Purification. 41 (1): 121–127. doi:10.1016/j.pep.2004.12.030. PMID 15802229. 
  19. ^Pédelacq JD, Cabantous S, Tran T, Terwilliger TC, Waldo GS (Jan 2006). "Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein". Nature Biotechnology. 24 (1): 79–88. doi:10.1038/nbt1172. PMID 16369541. 
  20. ^Barondeau DP, Kassmann CJ, Tainer JA, Getzoff ED (Apr 2002). "Structural chemistry of a green fluorescent protein Zn biosensor". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 124 (14): 3522–3524. doi:10.1021/ja0176954. PMID 11929238. 
  21. ^Lelimousin M, Noirclerc-Savoye M, Lazareno-Saez C, Paetzold B, Le Vot S, Chazal R, Macheboeuf P, Field MJ, Bourgeois D, Royant A (Oct 2009). "Intrinsic dynamics in ECFP and Cerulean control fluorescence quantum yield". Biochemistry. 48 (42): 10038–10046. doi:10.1021/bi901093w. PMID 19754158. 
  22. ^Goedhart J, von Stetten D, Noirclerc-Savoye M, Lelimousin M, Joosen L, Hink MA, van Weeren L, Gadella TW, Royant A (2012). "Structure-guided evolution of cyan fluorescent proteins towards a quantum yield of 93%". Nature Communications. 3: 751. Bibcode:2012NatCo...3E.751G. doi:10.1038/ncomms1738. PMC 3316892. PMID 22434194. 
  23. ^Miesenböck G, De Angelis DA, Rothman JE (Jul 1998). "Visualizing secretion and synaptic transmission with pH-sensitive green fluorescent proteins". Nature. 394 (6689): 192–5. Bibcode:1998Natur.394..192M. doi:10.1038/28190. PMID 9671304. 
  24. ^Hanson GT, Aggeler R, Oglesbee D, Cannon M, Capaldi RA, Tsien RY, Remington SJ (Mar 2004). "Investigating mitochondrial redox potential with redox-sensitive green fluorescent protein indicators". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 279 (13): 13044–53. doi:10.1074/jbc.M312846200. PMID 14722062. 
  25. ^Zacharias DA, Violin JD, Newton AC, Tsien RY (May 2002). "Partitioning of lipid-modified monomeric GFPs into membrane microdomains of live cells". Science. 296 (5569): 913–16. Bibcode:2002Sci...296..913Z. doi:10.1126/science.1068539. PMID 11988576. 
  26. ^Drepper, T., Eggert, T., Circolone, F., Heck, A., Krauss, U., Guterl, J. K., Wendorff, M., Losi, A., Gärtner, W., Jaeger, K. E. (2007). "Reporter proteins for in vivo fluorescence without oxygen". Nat Biotechnol. 25: 443–445. doi:10.1038/nbt1293. PMID 17351616.
3D reconstruction of confocal image of VEGF-overexpressing neural progenitors (red) and GFP-positive control neural progenitor cells (green) in the rat olfactory bulb. RECA-1-positive blood vessels - blue color.
The diversity of genetic mutations is illustrated by this San Diego beach scene drawn with living bacteria expressing 8 different colors of fluorescent proteins (derived from GFP and dsRed).
A palette of variants of GFP and DsRed (David Goodsell drawing)
Different proteins produce different fluorescent colors when exposed to ultraviolet light. (Picture taken by Erik A. Rodriguez.)
White light image, or image seen by the eye, of fluorescent proteins in image above. (Picture taken by Erik A. Rodriguez.)
E. coli colonies expressing fluorescent proteins. (Picture taken by Erik A. Rodriguez.)
GFP Movie showing entire structure and zoom in to fluorescent chromophore. Movie created by Erik A. Rodriguez with UCSF Chimera from PDB: 1EMA.
Superresolution with two fusion proteins (GFP-Snf2H and RFP-H2A), Co-localisation studies (2CLM) in the nucleus of a bone cancer cell. 120.000 localized molecules in a widefield area(470 µm2)

1. Albertson N H, Nystrom T, Kjelleberg S. Exoprotease activity of two marine bacteria during starvation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56:218–223.[PMC free article][PubMed]

2. Albertson N H, Stretton S, Pongpattanakitshote S, Kjelleberg S, Goodman A E. Construction and use of a new mini-Tn10:lac:kan transposon to identify environmentally responsive genes. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996;140:287–294.[PubMed]

3. Angles M L, Marshall K C, Goodman A E. Plasmid transfer between marine bacteria in the aqueous phase and biofilms in reactor microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:843–850.[PMC free article][PubMed]

4. Baumberg S, Cornelis G, Panagiotakopoulos M, Roberts M. Expression of the lactose transposon Tn951 in Escherichia coli, Proteus and Pseudomonas. J Gen Microbiol. 1980;119:257–262.[PubMed]

5. Bloemberg G V, O’Toole G A, Lugtenberg B J J, Kolter R. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for Pseudomonas spp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:4543–4551.[PMC free article][PubMed]

6. Burlage R S, Yang Z K, Mehlhorn T. A transposon for green fluorescent protein transcriptional fusions: application for bacterial transport experiments. Gene. 1996;173:53–58.[PubMed]

7. Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G, Ward W W, Prasher D C. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science. 1994;263:802–805.[PubMed]

8. Chen F, González M J, Dustman A W, Moran A M, Hodson R E. In situ reverse transcription, an approach to characterize genetic diversity and activities of prokaryotes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:4907–4913.[PMC free article][PubMed]

9. Christensen B B, Sternberg C, Molin S. Bacterial plasmid conjugation on semi-solid surfaces monitored with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) from Aequorea victoria as a marker. Gene. 1996;173:59–65.[PubMed]

10. Cormack B P, Valdivia R H, Falkow S. FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) Gene. 1996;173:33–38.[PubMed]

11. Dalton H M, Goodman A E, Marshall K C. Diversity in surface colonization behaviour in marine bacteria. J Ind Microbiol. 1996;17:228–234.

12. Davies D G, Geesey G G. Regulation of the alginate biosynthesis gene algC in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during biofilm development in continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:860–867.[PMC free article][PubMed]

13. Dhandayuthapani S, Via L E, Thomas C A, Horowitz P M, Deretic D, Deretic V. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression and cell biology of mycobacterial interactions with macrophages. Mol Microbiol. 1995;17:901–912.[PubMed]

14. Eberl L, Schulze R, Ammendola A, Geisenberger O, Erhart R, Sternberg C, Molin S, Amann R. Use of green fluorescent protein as a marker for ecological studies of activated sludge communities. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;149:77–83.

15. Gage D J, Bobo T, Long S R. Use of green fluorescent protein to visualize the early events of symbiosis between Rhizobium meliloti and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) J Bacteriol. 1996;178:7159–7166.[PMC free article][PubMed]

16. Gooday G W. The ecology of chitin degradation. In: Marshall K C, editor. Advances in microbial ecology. New York, N.Y: Plenum Press; 1990. pp. 387–430.

17. Grinter N J. A broad host range cloning vector transposable to various replicons. Gene. 1983;21:133–143.[PubMed]

18. Heim R, Cubitt A B, Tsien R Y. Improved green fluorescence. Nature. 1995;373:663–664.[PubMed]

19. Herrero M, de Lorenzo V, Timmis K N. Transposon vectors containing non-antibiotic resistance selection markers for cloning and stable chromosomal insertion of foreign genes in gram-negative bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:6557–6567.[PMC free article][PubMed]

20. Hodson R E, Dustman W A, Garg R P, Moran A M. In situ PCR for visualization of microscale distribution of specific genes and gene products in prokaryotic communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:4074–4082.[PMC free article][PubMed]

21. Jacobs D, Angles M L, Goodman A E, Neilan B A. Improved methods for in situ enzymatic amplification and detection of low copy number genes in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;152:65–73.[PubMed]

22. Kalogeraki V S, Winans S C. Suicide plasmids containing promoterless reporter genes can simultaneously disrupt and create fusions to target genes of diverse bacteria. Gene. 1997;188:69–75.[PubMed]

23. Keen N T, Tamaki S, Kobayashi D, Trollinger D. Improved broad host-range plasmids for DNA cloning in Gram-negative bacteria. Gene. 1988;70:191–197.[PubMed]

24. Kremer L, Baulard A, Estaquier J, Poulain-Godefroy O, Locht C. Green fluorescent protein as a new expression marker in mycobacteria. Mol Microbiol. 1995;17:913–922.[PubMed]

25. Labes M, Pühler A, Simon R. A new family of RSF1010-derived expression and lac-fusion broad-host-range vectors for Gram-negative bacteria. Gene. 1990;89:37–46.[PubMed]

26. Leff L G, Leff A A. Use of green fluorescent protein to monitor survival of genetically engineered bacteria in aquatic environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:3486–3488.[PMC free article][PubMed]

27. Matthysse A G, Stretton S, Dandie C, McClure N C, Goodman A E. Construction of GFP vectors for use in Gram-negative bacteria other than Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996;145:87–94.[PubMed]

28. Miller J H. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1972.

29. Miller V L, Mekalanos J J. A novel suicide vector and its use in construction of insertion mutations: osmoregulation of outer membrane proteins and virulence determinants in Vibrio cholerae toxR. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:2575–2583.[PMC free article][PubMed]

30. Miller W G, Lindow S E. An improved GFP cloning cassette designed for prokaryotic transcriptional fusions. Gene. 1997;191:149–153.[PubMed]

31. Nano F E, Kaplan S. Expression of the transposable lac operon Tn951 in Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 1982;152:924–927.[PMC free article][PubMed]

32. Östling J, Goodman A, Kjelleberg S. Behaviour of IncP-1 plasmids and a miniMu transposon in a marine Vibrio sp.: isolation of starvation inducible lac operon fusions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1991;86:83–94.

33. Podbielski A, Spellerberg B, Woischnik M, Pohl B, Lütticken R. Novel series of plasmid vectors for gene inactivation and expression analysis in group A streptococci (GAS) Gene. 1996;177:137–147.[PubMed]

34. Poulsen L K, Dalton H M, Angles M L, Marshall K C, Molin S, Goodman A E. Simultaneous determination of gene expression and bacterial identity in single cells in defined mixtures of pure cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;64:3698–3702.[PMC free article][PubMed]

35. Sambrook J, Fritsch E J, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989.

36. Sangari F, Agüero J. Mutagenesis of Brucella abortus: comparative efficiency of three transposon delivery systems. Microb Pathog. 1991;11:443–446.[PubMed]

37. Stretton S, Marshall K C, Dawes I W, Goodman A E. Characterisation of carbon dioxide-inducible genes of the marine bacterium Pseudomonas sp. S91. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996;140:37–42.[PubMed]

38. Techkarnjanaruk S, Pongpattanakitshote S, Goodman A E. Use of a promoterless lacZ gene insertion to investigate chitinase gene expression in the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. strain S9. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:2989–2996.[PMC free article][PubMed]

39. Tolker-Nielsen T, Holstrøm K, Molin S. Visualization of specific gene expression in individual Salmonella typhimurium cells by in situ PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:4196–4203.[PMC free article][PubMed]

40. Tombolini R, Unge A, Davey M E, de Bruijn F J, Jansson J K. Flow cytometric and microscopic analysis of GFP-tagged Pseudomonas fluorescens bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1997;22:17–28.

41. Valdivia R H, Hromockyj A E, Monack D, Ramakrishnan L, Falkow S. Applications for green fluorescent protein (GFP) in the study of host-pathogen interactions. Gene. 1996;173:47–52.[PubMed]

42. Webb C D, Decatur A, Teleman A, Losick R. Use of green fluorescent protein for visualization of cell-specific gene expression and subcellular protein localization during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:5906–5911.[PMC free article][PubMed]

Categories: 1

0 Replies to “How Is Green Fluorescent Protein Used In Genetic Research Papers”

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *